(2021-10-03 13:00)IfThisThenThat Wrote: I put House on ignore but it seems you can only avoid posts and not their quotes lol
It's clear you're desperate to repetitively explain you worked everything out and how SWTBM are committing war crimes, but nobody gives a shit. It's a biased, flawed analyses and it's very clear you're obsessed.
Haha the only obession I see here is your pathetic eviudence-free effort to discredit what I'm saying. Let's take one piece of that, what I said about non-nude model user ratings. You want to make the case that I'm wrong about that? Make it then. Here are a few other models to consider in that regard:
amy_haris: she is probably the hottest Russian studio non-nude right now, she was first on the first page when I saw her yesterday, and had 12k users in her room, riding the crest of the Swarm attracted by cute new non-nudes - she's been on CB for less than a week and already has over 40k followers. So she must have a green rating in the high 90s, right? Nope, she's in the red at 81%, 57 thumbs-ups and 14 thumbs-downs. Not sure why she has so few ratings, I don't know if she's doing privates yet and that's very likely where the largest number of ratings come from, but to already have 14 down votes for such a popular model in her first week is impressive. She doesn't declare her non-nudity, but her protector mods do.
Alice_loyse: I mention her because she is a very average pretty Russian model, she gets naked but generally isn't in public and isn't at the other end of the extreme, and she's been around for a while. She has 12.5k followers and a rating in the green at 98%, 80 ups and only 2 downs. I think she shows that you don't have to do that much to have a very good rating, just do basic delivery on reasonable expectations, especially in pvt.
Anna_seamoon: She's been around for less than 2 months, has only 3500 followers, and has a rating of 100%, 104 ups and 1 down (I guess thay always round upward). But she's strictly non-nude, what's going on here? Well, she's completely open about being non-nude, she has a tag on her page that says that and tells guys that without hesitation, and this includes in private. But she puts on a hot, very sensual show, I don't know her pvt price but she only charges 6/min for spying, as far as I know never disables that or gasses the pricing, and she never just sits in pvt doing nothing, she is a performer. She shows how non-nudity can and should work on what is a porn site, she's not a scammer.
B00m_clap: I saw her here today and checked her rating - 92%, 23 up and 2 down, and she's strictly non-nude, at least in public. She's a very pretty Russian blond who has been around for a long time, at least since late last year, and has 25k followers. So why does she have a green rating but so few votes for that amount of time and that number of followers? I think it's basically because she does nothing. She's very pretty so I'm guessing a lot of guys follow her to see if she ever starts doing anything, but that hasn't really happened. She overprices her privates, 60/min and 10-minute minumum, so doesn't do many of those, and always has spy disabled, so I have no idea what she does in there, but it doesn't seem to get her few takers dissatisfied enough to downrate her. When I looked in today she had only 10 viewers, which isn't unusual for her. Mostly she just sits there trying to look cute, as if that's enough to make money. She doesn't declare her non-nudity at all, and perhaps that's because she actually does get naked in pvt, who knows. She can't be called a scammer, because she doesn't do enough to be scamming, she just sits there. She's just not a performer who also seems to overrate her value and adheres to the contemporary version of the old "why buy the cow if you get the milk for free?" mentality that is so much of non-nude in public justification. She is the poster child for the failure of the non-nudity strategy, she could be making a shitload of money.
It doesn't take much to have a rating in the green in the 90s and top models do it almost universally. I looked at the top row on the top page and every one had a rating of 97% or higher, three at 100% - but no non-nudes there at that moment. Given that one has to have spent at least 25 tkns to rate biases the ratings toward this. But somehow there is this obvious pattern of non-nudes from studios with significant non-nudity of having poor ratings, particularly with their most-popular models. Which suggest scamming at at least a mild level, and arising out of a structural issue, the studios are supporting this behavior if not pushing it. And why is obvious when you consider what they must be doing in recruiting girls to fill their rooms.
Now, why does no one give a shit, as you said? I have to guess because they are infactuated with non-nude northern European innocent (underage?) teenage teases and so don't really care about the way they are allowing themselves to be manipulated and ripped off. This is their thing, and while some criticism of certain models for certain things is allowed (see the initiator of this topic), blanket criticism of a chronic issue simply isn't. So even when you put me on ignore because you just don't want to see what I have to say you have to take your shots at me anyway, because you desperately (and dishonestly) want to illegitimize what I'm saying. Fail.